Time to Get Serious About the Offertory Chant

Every Mass-going Catholic knows what happens at the Offertory during Mass. It is a segment of the liturgy that follows that final petition in the prayer of the faithful. Everyone sits down and gets comfortable for a bit.

The liturgy of the word has ended and the liturgy of the Eucharist is set to begin soon. But first the people are given an opportunity to put money in the basket as the ushers walk row by row. That money is put into a bigger basket and it is brought up the center aisle to the altar along with the bread and wine.

Then the Eucharistic Prayer begins. After another few minutes, the people stand again. The Offertory has come and gone. Is there any more to it than that? Is it really a kind of intermission that divides one section of Mass from another?

Let’s look at the General Instruction of the Roman Missal, paragraph #74:

The procession bringing the gifts is accompanied by the Offertory Chant, which continues at least until the gifts have been placed on the altar. The norms on the manner of singing are the same as for the Entrance Chant.

Most priests and choirs read that sentence and think: “the what? Never heard of it.”

Maybe “offertory chant” refers to some song or hymn or motet sung by the choir, just some random musical interlude we stick in there to pass the time. Not so. It is a prescribe part of the liturgy, even if it is almost universally dropped.

And as usual with the General Instruction, when people encounter some sentence or two that they don’t understand, they choose not to investigate further but rather to forget about it completely.

As a result, the offertory chant is rarely if ever sung in the ordinary form of Mass. And actually, this is rather shocking. It means that a major part of the liturgical text of the Mass is just being eliminated at our discretion, cut out or entirely replaced without a thought. And no one knows the difference. Surely, this is cheating the people, and cheating God too. Rather than pray the Mass we are instead deciding to do something else.

It doesn’t help that the mainstream pew resources say nothing of the offertory chant. They might list the entrance antiphon. They might list the communion antiphon. On weekdays, someone will usually read these. On Sunday, they are jettisoned for a hymn. But the offertory antiphon (which is actually technically called a responsory), is in even worse shape. It not not only excluded completely; it is not even missed.

I’ve done some private investigation of this problem myself, asking priests why they don’t insist that their choirs sing the offertory chant. Guess what? I couldn’t find a single priest who even knew that such a thing exists. Among the people I asked are very sophisticated and conscientious celebrants who are interested in “saying the black and doing the red.” These are not slackers here. The offertory chant just isn’t on the radar for them.

Now, this is interesting. Maybe it is some new part of the Mass introduced with the new English Missal? Not so. The liturgical documents of the 4th century indicate that the offertory is a very ancient part of the Mass. St. Augustine mentions such a chant too.

The action of the bringing forward of the gifts is a part of the offertory liturgy that was eliminated in the middle ages and underwent a restoration after the Second Vatican Council. But the records also indicate that the singing of a Psalm during this period is just as ancient. That part of the liturgical action as well. It was part of the medieval rite that was not eliminated. The offertory chant was prescribed to be sung by the schola in all pre-conciliar books, and it was a common feature of the Gregorian repertoire before late 1960s. .

With the post-conciliar reform, the bringing of the gifts was restored but the Psalm-based chant that had long been part of the offertory dropped out in practice, despite the mention of the chant in the rubrical instructions. There can be no real question that the conciliar reformers intended it as part of Mass. The song books that came out after the liturgical reform from 1969 through 1974 all included the offertory chant that is now absent without leave in most every presentation of the Mass in the ordinary form.

Here a clue as to why this happened. The offertory chant used to be part of the Missal on the altar, a text that was either sung by the choir or spoken by the priest in “low Masses” before the Council. When the Missal of 1970 made its first appearance, this chant was not included because the reformers imagined that every Mass would be a fully sung Mass, meaning that the offertory chant belonged to the schola, not to the celebrant. The Missal only contained the texts the the priest needed and no more. The rest of the texts were included in the liturgical books for the choir (just as the readings are part of a separate book called the Lectionary).

This explains why priests are largely oblivious to the existence of the offertory chant. Meanwhile, today’s choirs hardly even know that there are liturgical books for the choir at all. This too is an amazing oversight. When the new Missal was released, Pope Paul VI stated very plainly in the introduction that the Roman Gradual remains the music book for the Roman Rite. This is the book that contains all the assigned chants for the whole liturgical year. It has the entrance chant, the offertory chant, the communion chant, and all the Psalms and Alleluias too.

But the Roman Gradual gained no traction in these heady years when publishers and musicians were more interested in retrofitting pop songs with religious texts to make the Mass more accessible. Gregorian chant was out. Pop music was in. All the sung propers of the Mass were casualties, but the offertory chant even more than all the other chants. As a result, the offertory chant sits on the shelf gathering dust.

Now, you might say that this is hardly a surprise since that is generally true of all Gregorian chant. No one wants to hear the Latin, right? But this objection doesn’t quite hold up since there are plenty of English versions available today. And the music is available too.

So how does this work in practice? Instead of a coke-and-popcorn intermission, the Offertory period of the liturgy becomes an integral part of the liturgical action, and the presentation of the appointed text makes this very clear.

Consider the Seventeenth Sunday in Ordinary Time as an example. The Gospel is from St. Luke, Chapter 11. Jesus presents the “Our Father” prayer, and urges his disciples to pray it. He ends with the famous words: “ask and you will receive; seek and you will find; knock and the door will be opened to you.”

The offertory text on this sae day is from Psalm 30: “I will extol you, O Lord, for you have drawn
me up, and have not let my foes rejoice over me. O Lord, I cried unto you and you healed me.”

With this text we recall the words of the Gospel, or, rather, we experience how the Psalms foreshadowed the coming of the Messiah. The “Our Father” is precisely this act of extolling and the plea to be delivered from one’s foes. And the promise that we can ask and receive is seen in the Psalmist’s experience of crying out to the Lord and being healed.

The offertory, in this case, serves to reinforce and broaden the Gospel text and prepare us for the sacrifice on the altar the follows.

And so it is throughout the entire liturgical year. Every single Sunday has an appointed text. It should be sung every week, and even throughout the week.

From a practical point of view, the offertory chant has great advantages for choirs too. Instead of fishing around for another hymn that may or may not fit in with the liturgical structure, and badgering people to sing along with yet another participatory moment, the offertory chant permits people to sit quietly in reflection and contemplate.

A marvelous example of how this works comes from the Sacred Music Colloquium I attended only two weeks ago. The first Mass was all English. Keep in mind that the singers here are all people who came to the conference. It is not a professional group. They rehearsed together for the first time only a few hours earlier. Here you will heard the the antiphon: “I will bless the Lord who has given me understanding. I have set the Lord always in my sight; since he is at my right hand, I shall not be shaken.” Then follows more Psalms.

Here is a recording.

Singing this restores not only a practice that dates to the earliest centuries but one that continued without interruption until the 1970s, when it fell out of use almost inadvertently. It can be restored exactly as the General Instruction suggests in every parish, with very little work at all. The book from which this setting is taken is the Simple English Propers, so the congregation doesn’t have to suddenly adapt itself to Latin to experience the liturgy.

Here is a great example of something that has been on my mind for some years. The beautification of the Mass doesn’t require legislation. It doesn’t require that Bishops crack down. It doesn’t even require that music publishers get with it and start telling us what to do. It is within the power of every priest simply to ask the choir to sing the liturgy itself rather than sings songs at Mass. The text is there for us and the music too. It is simply a matter of making an effort to present the liturgy as it has been given to us.

17 Replies to “Time to Get Serious About the Offertory Chant”

  1. The recent history you're missing is the evolution past the four-hymn sandwich. Surely you're not suggesting we replace it with another kind of sandwich made at a more upscale deli?

    The experience of many clergy, liturgists, and musicians over the past few decades is that the Liturgy of the Word is complete. Something else beckons. Are people better prepared to engage in the Eucharist by another text, another song? Or is it a time for a more mindful preparation, even perhaps silence?

    It's a possible indulgence to our culture's fear of silence, of doing little or nothing, to fill up seemingly empty space with something. Anything. Please. And hurry up about it.

    And if they were so important, why aren't these pieces featured much more prominently in the Missal and associated documents?

    Todd

  2. While I applaud the recent re-discovery of the Offertory Antiphon and am happy to see it introduced on Sundays and solemnities in a few places (my awesome parish included), it's too much to ask it to be done during the week.

    Rubric 74 says that "the norms on the manner of singing [the Offertory Antiphon] are the same as for the Entrance Chant (cf. no. 48). Singing may always accompany the rite at the Offertory, even when there is no procession with the gifts."

    Turning as instructed to Rubric 48, we find, "If there is no singing at the Entrance, the antiphon given in the Missal is recited either by the faithful, or by some of them, or by a reader; otherwise, it is recited by the Priest himself…"

    Since the Offertory is not found in the Roman Missal, but rather in the Roman Gradual only, it is omitted at Masses without singing (which are the great majority of masses during the week). We may wish it were otherwise, but thems the rules.

  3. JT: "When the Missal of 1970 made its first appearance, this chant was not included because the reformers imagined that every Mass would be a fully sung Mass, meaning that the offertory chant belonged to the schola, not to the celebrant. The Missal only contained the texts the the priest needed and no more. The rest of the texts were included in the liturgical books for the choir (just as the readings are part of a separate book called the Lectionary)."

    CS: "And if they were so important, why aren't these pieces featured much more prominently in the Missal and associated documents?"

    ……………………………

  4. In the Ordinariate of Our Lady of Walsingham, as ex-Anglicans, we all stand up and sing a hymn during the Offertory. How does that fit in historically?

  5. I think the Offertory is a bit problematic in any case. The 1960s reformers envisaged a procession of the faithful with the gifts, followed by the Oratio super oblata (formerly the Secret). Paul VI insisted on the retention of the In spiritu humilitatis and Orate fratres, which was not welcomed by the reformers, who did not want reference to sacrifice at this point. However, the most important of the Offertory prayers, the Suscipe Sancta Trinitas (which in the Dominican Rite accompanies the simultaneous offering of bread and wine and is not shunted off to the end, as in the Tridentine) was suppressed.

    The Offertory chant is the only one that is often omitted by the schola in the EF, being replaced by a motet and/or an organ piece. The exception is the Requiem Mass where the Domine Jesu Christe still bears its old form as a Responsory. In recent years this form is being revived, and Solesmes has published an Offertoriale Triplex. Unlike the Introit and Communio, the verses are melismatic.

  6. I remember when the Offertory hymn was introduced in the 1960s. It was usually a song about us and what we are doing. No-one stood up (they still don't). What does irritate me is when the priest sits down and waits for the collection to be taken before the Offertory Procession can start, let alone the Offertory rite itself. The London Oratory sidesteps this neatly by not having an Offertory Procession at all. They also do not invite the congregation to offer each other the sign of peace. Both are optional.

  7. Todd: you're clearly a very creative chap; but sometimes it's better to go with the received than do our own thing. That's why our worship is liturgical, rather than Quaker, or Charismatic, or camp-meeting or whatever. it simply [sic] requires a little self-abnegation.

    ps I'm afraid your concluding question shows you didn't do more than skim Jeffrey's piece.

  8. You belong to a part of the Church that has found its way back from breach, error and iconoclasm to communion, orthodoxy and beauty. It will be interesting to see how the Ordinariate's patterns of worship stabilise and develop, particularly given the information coming out about its authorised liturgy, which looks like it might give the wider Church pause for thought about ways in which the new form of the Mass might be reconciled with tradition.

  9. Technical issue with Firefox and Opera: the HTML5 tag <audio> does not work with MP3 in these browsers, that's why you usually add an OGG file as a second source: <source src="something.ogg" type="audio/ogg">, providing the OGG file exists which is not the case here. http://www.w3schools.com/html/html5_audio.asp
    But you can still listen to the MP3 with an embedded Flash player: Phttp://www.music.dierschow.com/2013Colloquium/18Mass/Offertory.mp3″ target=”_blank”>http://www.gregorianbooks.com/p.php?p=MPhttp://ww…

  10. Sometimes the received is in need of reform. This issue is about a good bit more than "my own thing."

    Todd

  11. I completely agree with this. The Offertory chant is a beautiful thing that needs to be rediscovered. Though they're usually more difficult than the Introit or Communio – I've found choirs are far more interested in these chants.

  12. JT: "The beautification of the Mass doesn’t require legislation. It doesn’t require that Bishops crack down. It doesn’t even require that music publishers get with it and start telling us what to do. It is within the power of every priest simply to ask the choir to sing the liturgy itself rather than sings songs at Mass. The text is there for us and the music too. It is simply a matter of making an effort to present the liturgy as it has been given to us."

    CS: "Sometimes the received is in need of reform. This issue is about a good bit more than "'my own thing.'"

    ……………………………

  13. For the most part, 95-99% of ministry time, yes. Any other questions?

    Todd

  14. Not for now. Congratulations on the scintilla of self-doubt, BTW. We'll make a liturgist of you yet, Todd.

  15. Between 1965 and 1970, a number of us in religious communities (I was a Marianist for 4 years) were setting the English text of the various antiphons to more popular-style music. If you have access to our first album, COME FOLLOW, you will find versions of "By the Streams of Babylon" and "Out of the Depths" from the post-Pentecost season, in English with the psalm verses. Also Murphy's "There Was a Man" from the same season. All are for Offertory.

Comments are closed.