Simple Propers for the 23nd Sunday of Ordinary Time, Year C

Last week the Chant Café began an Experiment in Sacred Music Resource Production with an aim toward the singing of propers. There has been quite a response so far to this call for an open source effort that has the potential to create something “bigger than the sum of its parts” and to perhaps assist in bringing the singing of the proper texts of the Mass into the liturgical celebrations of ordinary parishes.

Click here to download simple settings of the proper for the Twenty Third Sunday in Ordinary Time.

We are calling this an “experiment” for many reasons. One reason is that we are taking a very non-conventional approach to the creation of liturgical music resources–a team of committed voluteers are busy working, at this very moment, on a database of liturgical source texts for the singing of the the Introit, Offertory and Communion chants. (There is still room for more to join in the effort!)

The second reason why this is an “experiment” is because we are not quite sure what the best solution will be for the parish that is beginning to sing propers for the first time.

Last week we posted some sample settings of the precessional propers for the 22nd Sunday of Ordinary Time.

This week we have a new batch of samples that we would like to present, and we invite you to take a look at them, sing through them, even sing them in this weekend’s liturgy, email them to friends, and, most importantly, share some feedback here in the comment box on what you think of them.

If you are in a parish that sings more elaborate musical settings of the Mass proper, even the Gregorian propers, fantastic! But think of the parish down the road that sings four hymns or songs out of the Gather Book, or the Music Issue–Would any of these settings of the proper be a practical solution for them if they were to sing this weekend’s communion antiphon? Maybe you could email them this PDF file and see what they think. Maybe they’ll give it a shot this weekend.

Here’s a quick look at a few of the samples that we put together this week:

First we have a few simple Gregorian psalm tones. Fortunately the English texts this week have mostly Latin-esque terminations. This makes for easy use of the Gregorian tones. When the ends of lines end with words like “God” or “Lord” (i.e. the final syllable carries a hard accent, which is likely 75% of the time in English) then using the Gregorian tones effectively becomes much more tricky. Still this could be a very practical way for parishes to begin singing the propers in a way that is deeply rooted in the Gregorian tradition.

Next we have a few English antiphons using Gregorian “solemn tones”. These are the tones found in the Graduale Romanum which are intended to be used with Gregorian Introits and Communions. That these are a bit more ornate makes them slightly easier to use with English texts, although problems do often occur with them. The effect here seems very nice to my ear. The question might be raised, though, as to whether this would be too difficult for the singers of an average parish today.

Then we have an Introit and Communion that are set to melodic formulas that were composed by myself and Fr. Columba Kelly, OSB. These are experimental formulas and we hope to compose several more in the 8 modes. The goal in this approach is to develop a set of melodic formulas that are composed from the conventions of the Gregorian musical language, and that will work very effectively with the cadence patterns of the English language. The overall melodic shape is something like an Office antiphon, and although they make great use of reciting tones, the effect is more like an antiphon than a psalm tone. The formulas can be applied to any English text and the hope is that the melodies are learned well once, and when they are used with different texts the melody will be intuitively recalled by the singer. So with a set of 8, 16, 24 or these melodies a parish could sing all of the Mass proper with formulas that they only have to learn once. I’m very excited to do some more experimentation with this model. So far I’m very happy with the results. What do you think?

Compare these with one of last week’s Introits which used the same Mode 1 formula, along with a few other Mode 2 settings that utilize the same melodic formula:

Lastly, we have two examples that use St. Meinrad Tones. These tones are very simple and work well with English texts 100% of the time. They do not follow the traditional 2-part arrangement of the Gregorian psalm tones, but are expandable for up to 6-lines of text, with a different melodic formula for each line. This works well with the “Hebrew” grouping of the psalms that is found in the Grail Psalter, and the forthcoming Revised Grail. The overall shape of an antiphon, using these tones, is similar to the melodic formulas described above. There is an overall “Roman” arch in the melody, with the typical Gregorian melodic “swirling” along the way. I am very satisfied with the result of this approach. It offers an ultra-simple method for parishes who would like to begin singing the propers, is rooted deeply in Gregorian modality, and it works instantly and very intuitively with the termination structures of the English language. What do you think of these?

And very lastly, the psalm tones for the verses are composed by Fr. Samuel Weber, OSB. These are similar to the St. Meinrad Tones, but arranged for the traditional 2-line layout of the psalms. These are even simpler than the Meinrad tones, are firmly rooted in Gregorian modality, are quite beautiful yet are incredibly easy to sing. These tones are also used in the Mundelein Psalter. Using these tones with the above antiphon settings allows for a nice contrast between antiphon and verse and seems like a very good solution especially for the parish that is singing the propers for the first time.

Please share your thoughts! What would be most effective for your parish, or the parishes you know? Feedback is very welcome!