Seven Days of Heaven, or a week in “Indie”

Photo courtesy of Charles Cole

I have a certain respect for the cultural assignation “indie.” Basically it’s a post-boomer rhetorical add-on to both the lexicon and parlance for artistic endeavors and projects un-beholden to “the man” or “the machine.” In filmdom and popular music is where one finds its most common usage. Directors like Gus Van Zant. Werner Herzog, John Sayles (to name but a few) and musicians such as Jewel, Kurt Cobain and Ani DiFranco distinguished their total independence from the artistic status quo and the requisite funding and handling that attends their respective industries. However, for the hundreds and even thousands of secular (and, who knows, sacred) “indie” artists who achieved acclaim on their own, by their own rules and inertia, most of them ended up integrating into the interdependence of the “machine” who recognized, funded and marketed their unique visions and voices so as to charm and enchant larger audiences to the spices and perspectives of their particular artistry to massive scales. It’s how this world works.

It is to this progression from independence (not liberty) to interdependence that occupies my heart this day after finally getting home from “Indy.” That and “jet lag” (four hour flight, hour to car from LAX, three hours to home and hugs, including total facial from senior French bulldog!) I was eight years ago almost disdainful of the attribution of “Seven Days of Musical Heaven” to the CMAA Colloquium. Seven years ago I decided to check out for myself this clever shill and then discovered true intra-dependence among the faculty and 100 attendees at the 2007 DC colloquium. Coming from a perspective informed both by independence (at the job level of teaching and parish) and corporate mindsets cultivated by NPM and ACDA, I had never before been swept away by the intra-dependence of absolute consensus about the “task at hand.” That, of course, was and remains the fit, right, universal, beautiful and (to the best of all abilities) sacred worship of our Creator by a manner of His creation: the art of music.

(Picking up essay Wednesday morning.) The first thing that comes to mind about the willingness and discipline involved in moving from independence to interdependence results from listening to one recording at Carl Dierschow’s website, the ubiquitous Mozart AVE VERUM CORPUS sung at our first Mass by all 250 of us at Indy under Horst. I personally was transfixed and transformed in those moments, not using the score at all. It was glorious and truly enthused. And you can hear that, feel that when listening to the mp3! Well, think about this: Carl wasn’t there, yet he gifts us by taking upon the compiling of our archives. (A bunch of other folks I love and respect weren’t physically there, but they can be because of Carl.) And no one then or at any other moment of the week engaged in what other groups call “showcases” at their confabs. Another moment flashed through my synapses- a particular moment when Dr. Buchholz asked assistance from his brilliant wife for unifying an incipit passage in the Requiem among the sopranos, addressing her as “Dr. Nam.” It was both so appropriate and so loving a gesture. And this was my first year with any meaningful encounters with Dr. Nam. She had heard of my bronchitis and made a point of checking upon me and asking me if I was aggressively treating the infection. Then later she noticed me leaving the hotel for St. John’s Church and shouted after me, offering to drive me in her car.

Oh, and did I mention the Requiem? Oh, well, it was literally “musical heaven,” an occasion of deep faith and witness, but also of ineffable joy. The profound, unfathomable presence of the Catafalque, Fr. Pasley’s explication of it prior to Mass, and then his amazing, word perfect mini-homily about the cross-relation (pun intended) between what the Catafalque represents and the eschatology of the light emerging the jeweled windows of St. John’s providing us sure hope, even knowledge that “we are not alone.” And because of the Requiem (and particular the Dies irae, for myself) we are not independent of each other and our Creator, Savior and Succor.

There are not enough superlatives to laud Janet Gorbitz, Mary Jane Ballou and sweet Mary “Mezzo” for their efforts they inherited early this year in order that colloquium could even get off the ground. And it soared! Enough thanks I cannot express privately or publicly to Richard Chonak for untold hours and years he’s personally provided me life and career-edifying help. Those who’ve known me and yet remained my friends (!) over these seven years of colloquia and fori know I’m a puddle-of-tears softie emo (in the parlance of our time) but little things such as claiming dearest Wendi and her mom as my sisters, the brave, undaunted Jessica as my adopted CMAA daughter, the new tangible friendship of my incredibly hospitable roomie who essentially made my visit to Indy possible, which I caricatured as the new CMAA “Felix and Oscar Odd Couple,” and upon whom I saved my requisite faux pas for the very end, when I spilled red wine upon his immaculate white shirt simply by standing up when Dr. Labounsky was leaving the table at the final brunch! David, you are delight! May all good graces come your way.

I think of the amazing Aristotle! Our Aristotle, Esquerra, and his loving bride, flashing that incandescent, Cheshire Cat smile at every encounter, but yet so humble of heart after all the very real musical contributions and references for us for decades. And we are still interdependent upon those of us whom we’ve met at CMAA events for so many years. Kathy from Reno who’s quarter century of faithful, (gotta be sacrificial) attendance at colloquia is a sure foundation upon which all these beautiful young people can stand and sing our prayers. And the clergy? I’m speechless in anticipation of the renewal that some of our boomers, genX’ers and millennial priests and seminarians will assist our Lord in reviving the living traditions of our ritual faith expressions. Can it be that the ever eloquent and intellectually gifted Fr. Smith was the same person who quietly giggled when I uttered a sibilant a split second too early on Saturday and ducked when Horst’s head turned faster than the Terminator’s knowing that face would have red eyes of death by lazar beam? Yup, same guy.

We are also indebted to the Kathy Pluths, Arlene’s, JT’s, Norman from Oregon, Mary Ann the Singing Mum, and our cyber buds Noel, CDub, Liam, francis, J.Quick, RollingRJ, et al who were absent this year but ever-present. Told you all I’m a crier, in all meanings of that word. Lastly, there is only One-in-Three to whom we are totally DEPENDENT, and to Him I offer my thanks. And I should not be surprised, hopefully upon the moment when the purgatory light turns from red to green in my eyes, that when I first see my Maker, He’ll probably look not unlike William Mahrt. We were Indy, not “indie.” (No Pelagian implication intented!)

Great New (and Free!) Practical Resource for Singing Chant Hymns and Other Popular Chants

In a trans-atlantic collaboration, a new resource has become available through the dedicated work of Schola Sanctæ Scholasticæ.

http://gregorian-chant-hymns.com is a collaboration between Schola Sanctæ Scholasticæ (Dr. Candy Bartoldus, Clare Bowskill, Julia Jones, Martina Jelinkova), St. Cecilia’s Abbey in Ryde, Pluscarden Abbey in Scotland, the CMAA, St. Peter’s Abbey in Solesmes, and the Society of St. Bede.

The main page of the website, Hymns, has an alphabetical list of some of the best-known and loved office hymns, as well as many votive antiphons and other popular chants (e.g., Adoro te, Ave Maris Stella [in multiple tones], Jesu Dulcis Memoria, etc.). Each chant comes with a fine recording, a copy of the score (for viewing on the website or easy download), and an easy-to-cut-and-paste or easy-to-download text and translation.

The Build-a-Booklet page has JPEG files of the scores as well as PDFs of the translations in clear typesetting, making it easy to copy and paste the text into a file you’re creating.

The Booklets page has the following pre-assembled booklets for download, including several hymnal-type publications a parish might print for pew use.

  1. The Mass in Latin with the Setting Mass VIII (Missa de Angelis) – abridged version – Ordinary Form of the Mass
  2. Music for the Mass and Benediction
  3. Order of the Mass: Weekday – Missa VIII (De Angelis) – Extraordinary Form of the Mass
  4. Exposition and Benediction
  5. Tenebrae (Extraordinary Form) – Holy Saturday
  6. Latin Mass Hymnal (older document) – Ordinary Form of the Mass
  7. The Mass in Latin with the Settings Mass I, VIII, XI, and XVII
The Guides page has a newly-typeset guide to Gregorian notation and Latin pronunciation as helps to newly-forming scholæ. The Resources page is also a helpful amalgamation of websites, etc., that would be useful to send as a single-link resource to new chanters. 

7-7-07 at 7

Today marks the 7th anniversary of the promulgation of Summorum Pontificum, which gave priests and faithful wider access to Mass celebrated according to the 1962 Missal.

Unfortunately, today in some circles will mark a renewal in the kind of complaining I saw recently on a usually very good blog, which was lamenting the loss of Pope Emeritus Benedict, in a most un-Benedictinelike spirit of grumbling. Some people do seem to be complaining quite a lot that we don’t have the Holy Father to whom we had become, quite reasonably, attached.

I have two responses to this grumbling. First, people would to well to honor the Pope Emeritus by following his example of joyful obedience. The Church is always more than one man, thank God. It has room for each of us, thank God, and for Paul and Apollos and Cephas as leaders.

When the temptation to grumble comes, it might be good to ask: what would the Emeritus himself do? What would he say?

Secondly, it helps to remember that the reign of Pope Benedict XVI was a historical anomaly. Nobody ever gets Pope Benedict XVI. We did. We had him for years and years. No one ever gets a Holy Father who is a patristic, biblical and liturgical scholar, with the depth of knowledge of the Church’s needs that can only come from heading the CDF for decades, who asked Santa Claus for a book of liturgical commentary at the age of seven, who made courageous and difficult decisions throughout his career, who is a teacher by nature, and a musician, whose reflective personal style is almost itself liturgical, and whose every word and action reflect the fidelity of a disciple. No one since probably the year 604 has ever had this kind of Holy Father–and we had him for years.

Decades from now, when the elderly Ben Yanke is tenderly sending off his 45th great-grandchild to schola for the first time, he or she will ask, “Great-grandpop, do you remember what Pope Benedict was like?” And Ben will be able to say yes, and he will tell the child the story of Summorum Pontificum, and once again from his heart say, like so many do today, Thank You, dear Holy Father.

Colloquium Vlog – Day 5+6

The mood has been bittersweet as we complete our final day. My apologies for the missed video yesterday, so I incorporated some clips from yesterday before playing today’s clips.

And again, if you haven’t been following Charles Cole’s photos on New Liturgical Movement, I’d highly encourage you to check them out, particularly pictures of today’s amazing requiem for deceased CMAA members.

You will sing, and you will like it! Really.

Photo courtesy of Charles Cole

My bronchial infection worsened a bit Saturday, but I was bound and determined to sing the Victoria Requiem. I thank our most merciful Lord for His grace that fulfilled that desire. Allow me a small digression. One of  our celebrants this week was singing in Horst’s choir with us. I. had noticed a very beautiful cobalt/royal blue shoulder sling bag and casually remarked to him how enchanting it looked. He replied, “It’s yours.” Little did he know, but yesterday was my Geburtstag! I actually got a B-day present at Colloquium! And this wonderful priest was my confessor in addition to delivering one of the most stirring homilies I’ve ever heard on Visitation Day.

But this is about Horst Buchholz and his amazing charisms, his love for our Church, and his obvious devotion to reverencing our Lord through the achievement of sheer beauty.

I remember my first colloquium (I think 2007, at CUA/Shrine) when attendance was still around 100 or so folks. There were only two choirs- the everybody choir and a select chamber choir under Scott Turkington. Horst had us all. God bless them, the lovely ladies of the soprano section had trouble all week with various issues throughout various pieces. I think the Elgar “Ave Verum Corpus” was particular nettlesome for them. But through the week of rehearsals I observed Horst’s methodical but mirth-filled prodding of them to match this, blend that, and so forth. And by Sunday Mass the ladies sounded quite solid and sure. Horst Buchholz.

I’ve sung intermittently with him on a few motets over these years. But this is the first year that I wanted to be his chorister for the Victoria Requiem. His direction of the Vierne Mass in SLC 2012 was the choral highlight of that wonderful colloquium for me. And this year, a substantial number of very talented singers thought likewise about Horst and we had us quite a quire.

Despite his obvious impish jokes and mannerisms (from his huge Teutonic aura) he is one serious and demanding Kapellmeister! He knows exactly what he wants down to the turn of a phoneme to the arch of an entire Mass movement, and he doesn’t settle for the choir he hears in his mind, he molds the choir facing him into that ideal ensemble. Relentlessly. But never ruthlessly.

“The net result in this case was a masterful performance teased out of group of singers of various levels who’ve never sung as an ensemble prior to this week.” was my friend David Saunder’s very apt observation. And how appropriate is it that the joy of the architecture of beauty described in Father Pasley’s homily regarding the sure knowledge we have of the light from outside the jeweled windows of the pro-cathedral was also reflected on the faces of Horst’s choristers via the medium of a Requiem.

Thank you maestro Buchholz, all of the other faculty, the board and especially Janet, Mary Jane, Mary “Mezzo” and Kyle for a most rewarding week, and certainly one of the more exhilerating birthday gifts yesterday I’ve ever been gifted. (I remarked to the pro-cathedral’s young, brilliant Spanish organist/(DM?) that should I expire from joy before the Dies Irae, he was to assemble impromptu pall bearers and place my former self in the catafalque subito! With a smile like Horst’s on my face, no doubt.)

The 3Fs: Free, Frank, and Friendly

In an Italian communique about the most recent talks of the Council of Cardinals–currently the “gang of nine” closest advisers to the Holy Father–the Vatican spokesman suddenly broke into English to describe the talks as “free, frank, and friendly:” the 3Fs.

That’s something I’ve always liked about the atmosphere of the Church Music Association, that it is free, frank, and friendly. We can often add “funny” to the description, and sometimes we unfortunately have that artistic temperament thing that happens once in a while, but generally speaking the 3Fs describe our mutual dealings. This is not, in my experience, the norm for liturgists as a whole, who sometimes sadly communicate in ways that might be described as the 4Cs: Constrained, condemning, clannish, codespeaking, or even the 5Bs: Backbiting, boorish, baneful, baseless, and banal.

I suppose the joyful and free attitude among the CMAA comes mostly from drinking from deep wells full of rich beauty. It’s pretty hard to be grumpy and calculating in the midst of the sublime. Might as well just be happy.

For whatever reason, it is something to give thanks for.

Speaking of the 3Fs, I took a look yesterday at the current Magnificat over coffee with my after-morning-Mass friends, and was alternately pleased and disappointed by the two office hymn translations of mine in the issue. One is all about the 3Fs, and the 3Ss: Simple, sober, and smooth. Good one. The other is, like most English translations of Latin hymns, 3 other Ss: Stitled, stiff, and synthetic.

Here’s the free and friendly one, a translation of Dulci depromat carmine, a 15th c. hymn designated in our current Liber Hymnarius as the Office of Readings hymn for one virgin:

Let all the people join to raise
their sweetest songs of love and praise.
The solemn festal crowd combines
while in the heav’ns this virgin shines.

This virgin, resolute and strong,
stayed free for Christ her whole life long.
She spent her life in praise and prayer
and joins the saints in glory fair.

She conquered weak and fleshly sins,
with chastity the victory wins.
The flattery of earth she spurned
and to the steps of Christ she turned.

Through her, O Christ, watch where we go,
protecting us from every foe.
Correct our sins, save us from wrong,
and in the virtues make us strong.

O Jesus, Virgin-born, to you
be glory, as is ever due,
whom with the Father we adore
and loving Spirit evermore.

To my ears, this translation sounds like normal English singing. It doesn’t follow every hymn writing “rule” in a strict way. For example, it uses inversions of normal English word order more than some editors might like. But overall the effect is clear and simple, I think, and people could easily sing it with understanding.

Here’s the more embarrassing translation, of the 10th century hymn for one confessor, Iesu, corona celsior.

O Jesus Christ, most lofty Crown,
O Truth surpassing all renown,
you give rewards eternally
to those who serve you faithfully.

 O grant Your gathered Church, we pray,
through Him we celebrate today,
remission of their sinful stains
by breaking their enslaving chains.

He kept all vanity away
in virtue through his earthly day,
and with a zealous mind kept free
he served you most devotedly.

Most loving King, O Christ most blest,
This priest continually confessed,
and with a manly strength he trod
the host of enemies of God.

In clear and faithful strength he stayed,
and with fidelity he prayed,
and kept to purity and fast,
and gains the heav’nly feast at last.

To God the Father glory be,
and to His Son eternally
whom with the Spirit we adore
forever and forevermore.

While the original of this second hymn is probably theologically richer than that above, to my ears the translation falls a little flat. It’s a matter of tone, and especially of simplicity, that is missing, and as I read it, I keep thinking that it needs one more draft to have quite the smoothness, flexibility, and candor that makes a text ready to be sung.