Episcopal Ordination, Oakland, California
Today, Saturday at 2 pm EDT, 11 am PDT, the livestream is available here for the episcopal ordination of the Most Rev. Michael Charles Barber in Oakland.
Interview with Fr. Guy Nicholls – highly recommended
And Now the Work Begins
I’ll admit that my friends and I really sweated this one out for a while. Were we going to see efforts to reverse the progress? Would we fall back into the default mode of the rupture that characterized the previous decades? Would everything unravel?
Those fears some of us had in the those days after the election seem seriously misplaced at this point. And this has reminded those of us who live and breathe liturgy that there are other issues that the Pope must concern himself with. News flash: It’s a pretty big job overall. There is curial reform. Evangelism. Scandals suppression. Doctrinal controversies. Religious orders. Politics. Really, it’s endless. And every Pope has a focus based on the needs of the time.
A story to reflect on here. Back in the middle of the 19th century, we saw the formation of what was later called the Liturgical Movement. They began a new effort to focus on the liturgy as a neglected feature of Catholic life. As part of this, the monks of Solesmes began a focus on repairing the chant from centuries of neglect. It took decades but then they were ready for real influence. They hoped and prayed for reform toward a more authenticate liturgical experience.
But they had to wait. Pius IX had to deal with the loss of the Papal states, the decline of the temporal power, the end of monarchy in Europe, the rise of the socialist menace, the push of democracy in the U.S. and abroad — all of which meant gigantic changes in the way the Church relates to the world. He called a Church council and that led to more upheaval.
The liturgy people had to wait it out.
Then Leo XIII came along and had to deal with global economic upheaval, the rise of communism, the demands of labor, dramatic technological changes, extended lifespans and the demographic craziness that implied, the rise of prosperity and the moral issues thereby, the appearance of atheism and modernism, and the crying need for an expansion of Catholic moral teaching to the social sphere. This is a gigantic number of responsibilities.
The liturgy people had to wait.
A full half century went by from the beginnings of the liturgical movement before election of Pius X in 1903. Finally the moment had arrived. There was peace and many of the above questions had already been addressed. Now there could be focus. Like Benedict XVI, Pius X was a musician who had an intense interest in the liturgy and chant. He issued a Moto Proprio on music — one that generations had waited for. He approved the new chant books. He was the culmination of so much work and for those who cared about this issue, his pontificate was a dream come true.
But he died in 1914. Now there was a world, a ghastly murderous war that consumed the whole of Europe in flames and bloodshed. Benedict XV was there as a proclaimer of peace. He taught and worked toward this. He condemned war against civilians and the new age of industrial murder — a historical first. He was a serious man and did mighty and wonderful things to bring the teachings of the Church to bear on modern life. What had not figured into his outlook: liturgy. It was not part of what he did.
What did the musicians do? How did the liturgists respond? I can imagine that they were initially rather down in the dumps. Their issues were suddenly out of the spotlight. People stopped focussing on them. Probably many people stopped caring anymore. They probably felt a bit like orphans. Where are the controversies? Where is the momentum for change? Where is the life, the action, the energy, the productivity?
At this point, they might have just thrown in the towel and said: well, clearly we aren’t that important to the life of the Church. But that is not what happened. What they did was get to work. They built schools. They started organizations. They published books. They started new conferences. They trained others. They weren’t going to let this moment pass. They took the flame that Pius X had given them and turned it into a raging fire. The pontificate of Pius X turned out to be just the beginning.
So it is in our time. Benedict XVI and his papacy were epic for liturgy and music and for those who care so intensely. But these are not the only issues. We had our Pope and we had our time. But we must not depend on that. The idea here was to give us the push we needed and then send us out to do our work. If we do not do this work, we might as well be rejecting the gift and turning away from our responsibilities. Any cause that is right and true must continue to live and grow. It cannot depend on leadership. It must become self-sustaining.
That is where we are today. We are at the beginning of a long process. Where are nowhere near where we need to be. If you doubt it, drive about 60 miles from your home and attend a liturgy at the closest Catholic Church. See what happens. Observe the decor. Listen to the music. See how people respond. Check the skills and talents of the musicians. See the rubrics. What you will find is that this parish is probably only 10% of where it needs to be.
Consider your own role in this process. Are there things you can do in your own parish? Is there time you can commit? Is there a conference you can attend? Are there financial resources you can donate to the cause? Can you assist as a parent or teacher? If you feel that calling and you care, this is for a reason. You are probably being asked to play a bigger role. Now is the time to do it.
Benedict XVI gave us something spectacular. But there are other concerns in the world too and the Papacy must attend to those. It is up to us to make a difference and carry that Benedictan legacy forward into the future. There is work to be done. We must be the ones to do it. The change toward a brilliant future has just begun.
Cancel your Subscription Missal and Save your Parish Thousands
Parishes are sometimes cautious about switching from a disposable subscription missal program to a permanent one because they are confronted with an up-front price that is higher than what has been budgeted for in the current year. Additionally, pastors are sometimes concerned about saddling a parish with something for years, fearing that once the permanent resource has been purchased, it must be used for a decade or more to be worth the investment.
The truth, though, is that the Lumen Christi Missal – a complete, permanent replacement for your disposable missal program – will pay for itself in under three years!
If a parish keeps the LCM in their pews for 2.5 years, it will have broken completely even. If, for whatever reason, the parish had a desire to move back to a subscription missal after this time, they could do so without having lost a cent.
However, when a parish keeps the LCM in their pews for 10 years (or longer!), they will save upwards of $34,000, if not more!
In a time of constant economic insecurity, the Lumen Christi Missal is a way be a good steward of your parish’s limited resources.
Our own Jeffrey Tucker reviewed the LCM here. You can place an order here.
Or if you’d like to contact us directly about bringing the Lumen Christi Missal to your parish, you can reach us by email at info@illuminarepublications.com, or by phone at 602-910-4180.
Sacra Liturgia, one month away
Sacra Liturgia 2013 is only one month away. Already people from 30 countries are registered to attend. You can join them in Rome. Register
Notes about Polyphony at the Colloquium
Francisco Guerrero (Sevilla, 1528-1599) enjoyed enormous fame in his time, having taken a prominent post as maestro de capilla (singing master, i.e. music director) at Jaén Cathedral in Spain. More than any composer of his generation, he spent his life in Spain and thoroughly reflects the distinctiveness of the Spanish polyphonic tradition, which has distinctive traits as compared with Italian or English polyphony of the period. His rising prominence in our time is most likely due to these traits which include distinct structural roles for each voice and a firm underlying pulse that is inaudible but always present. His Requiem Mass is one of his many masterpieces, and a lesser known Requiem setting. The conductors are Wilko Brouwers and Horst Buchholz.
Orlando Di Lasso (1530-1594) was a Flemish composer of astonishing skill who left us a huge library of music in many styles. His Missa Osculetur Me is written for eight voices and features surprising drama and a rich texture that explores the most advanced polyphonic techniques of his time. Recordings of this piece sometimes feature instruments as a substitute for voices but in the Collequium presentation we will use all voices, to realize an idealization of this masterpiece.It is conducted by Wilko Brouwers and Gregory Glenn.
Sergei Rachmaninoff’s “Ave Maria” was written for his Russian Vespers service but the Colloquium will sing a version in Latin. It is surely one of the most emotionally affecting and powerful settings of this glorious text to be found in the treasury of sacred music. It is also something that can be sung by a parish schola. It is conducted by Horst Buchholz.
Josquin de Prez (1450-1521) is a case of a composer who only seems to grow more popular over time. He had a huge influence on nearly every important polyphony composer of the 16th century but his influence continued onward. This “Ave Maria” has never been sung at the Colloquium but is popular among professional polyphonic choirs because of its creative use of shifting ranges and antiphonal repetitions that suggest ethereal joy and celebration. It is conducted by Gregory Glenn.