Despite fifty years of opposition to rediscovering our musical heritage, there are vital signs of renewal, thanks largely to renewal of the chant in monasteries, to periodicals and online agencies whose sole purpose is to revitalize the Church through sacred music.
Vatican Radio Interview with Organizer of the Sacra Liturgia Conference
“This conference is in June, in Rome, and the subject is the place of the liturgy, and liturgical formation for the New Evangelisation,” says Bishop Dominique Rey of Fréjus-Toulon. He says, “I had the joy of participating in the Synod for the New Evangelisation, I have seen . . . the essential place of the liturgy for the New Evangelisation. Because in the liturgy we receive the grace of God, and in the liturgy there is the association between the Sacrament, and the transmission of faith, the content of faith, and the meeting of all the community during this sacred moment.”
Jeffrey Tucker is among the distinguished panel of conference speakers. More about the interview here.
Boston Benefit Concert Tonight
Office Hymn for the Feast of the Day: Christe, Pastorum
The Office hymn Christe, Pastorum is a hymn for the Common of Pastors. It has a flexible structure that allows it to be sung for a Pope, Bishop, or Priest, because there are 3 different versions of verse 2.
Here is, for the Feast of Pope St. Pius V, Christe, Pastorum for a Pope.
CMAA: Now with 100% more GitHub
tl;dr — https://github.com/CMAA
I’ve mentioned before that I think we (that is, creators and users of Sacred Music) should adopt some of the tools and techniques of Open Source development. Differences of opinion in the Free vs. Copyrighted realm aside, I have to assume that most people ’round these parts have seen the value of free resources made available by or through CMAA.
Unfortunately, up to now, all the resources that have been made available publicly have been finished products- PDFs and/or printed books. These have the greatest immediate impact, since they can used right away by almost anybody. However, the problem here is that anyone wishing to expand upon any particular project or source has to spend time and energy to needlessly re-create the work of someone else.
In many cases this is unavoidable: We don’t have source files for a book printed 100 years ago- we just have the book, and now (thanks to JT’s scanner) we have a digital copy of it. But in many cases, there are files- or there could be. If you have typeset a piece of music in square notes using Gregorio, you have a source file. By all means, publish the compiled PDF- most people wouldn’t know what to do with a GABC file in the first place. But someone who does know might be able to use it: to re-set the music with a translation, to re-compile it with an improved rendering engine, to resize and reformat it to fit the style of their own publication or congregational worship aide.
Gregorio and Lilypond files are probably the most prevalent of the existing works that could be made available publicly. Simple text files of hymn texts and translations (either in the public domain or released via Creative Commons) would also be helpful to people. There was a discussion on the CMAA forums a while ago related to setting music for Braille- a process which requires (if I remember correctly) having the music in XML format. And heck- even though text-based version-control doesn’t work all that well for it, there’s nothing all that wrong with making Finale or Sibelius files available as well.
So- to that end, we now have a CMAA account at GitHub. The rest of this post is an explanation of what that means and how to use it, not (mostly) about why.
What is GitHub, anyway?
GitHub is a version control platform with built-in social and collaboration features. Yeah, yeah- but what does that mean?
- Version Control
- You want the latest version of a file, right? But maybe you want to see an earlier version. Maybe one of the other people working on it messed it up and you want to revert to an earlier version. Maybe you’d like to see the evolution of an idea through multiple iterations of the same file.
- A Version Control system (in its simplest form) stores each version of a file, going back to the creation of that file. A group of files is stored in a Repository (or “repo”), and you can go back and see (or use) the repo as it was at any point in the past.
- For more information, see this article about the idea of Version Control in general.
- Built-in Social Features
- A little bit like Facebook, GH allows people to follow each other’s projects, get updates on changes and releases. This brings the possibility for the type of communication and community that we’ve come to know at the CMAA forums into the actual process of resource creation.
- Built-in Collaboration Features
- Issue tracking, repo-specific wikis, the ability to fork/branch/merge repos. The ability to easily see diffs (what has changed from one version to another).
How is this organized? Do I just upload my stuff somewhere?
GitHub uses “repos” (Repositories). A single repo is a single project, which might contain several, or several thousand, files. If you wanted to use GitHub to keep track of a project to transcribe the entire Gradual Romanum into Gregorio notation, that would be one single repo.
Since it is likely that many people have small, one-off projects that don’t need an entire repo to themselves (“I wrote this one hymn… you can use it if you want.”), we will probably create one or more “catch-all” repos for those items.
If you are moderately savvy at this sort of thing, go create a GitHub account. You can create your own repos (which CMAA can then follow, to let people know where they are), or if you have a project you’d like CMAA to house, send us a note through GH and we’ll make it happen. This is still a little new (obviously) so we’re trying to work out the best way to handle it- so just drop me a line and we’ll figure it out together.
If this whole thing seems totally confusing, but you want to make your stuff available- just email me or post it to the forums. I can easily GitHub-ize your project and post it myself.
Once something is at GitHub, what can happen to it?
The whole point of GitHubbing (yeah, I verbed it) is that it allows people to collaborate, fork, and merge.
- Collaborate
- Suppose you have a giant project- like doing a Gregorio transcription of the entire Graduale Romanum. With GitHub, people could just volunteer to do a couple pages or a single chant, and it’s pretty easy to combine that effort so that everyone is contributing to a single source.
- Fork
- Forking a project means (in essence) making a complete copy of it into a new repo, so that you can take the project in a different direction without interfering with the original.
- Merge
- A merge is the opposite of a fork- bringing back together two different lines of a project.
Any specific big plans for GitHub?
So far- just see what happens. I’m sure it will be wholly unimpressive for the short-term. I’m hoping to start creating repos out of some of the work already available, though scattered around a bit, on the Forum and the CMAA website. If you have source files for anything you’ve worked on or are in the middle of, which you’d like CMAA to host, please let us know.
I’m hopeful that, once a critical handful of people get comfortable with GitHub and (more importantly) text-based music engraving, we’ll see some cool things come out of it.
In the meantime, I’m also trying to put together some general “development guides” that would be helpful for all of this- suggestions for project organization, file formats- that sort of thing. Obviously, nothing like “you must do it this way” – just some evolving thoughts on how to use these tools. This article is part of the first commit to that repo.
Where can I learn more?
I wrote two lengthy articles about Open Source Sacred Music at my blog. The first one lays out the foundations of my thinking on the matter. If you want to skip all my anti-IP propaganda, go right to the last paragraph which has links to other educational resources. The second one covers my thoughts related to specific projects which might be useful, so if you’re thinking of starting something, but don’t know what, check that out.
And, just to be clear- you certainly don’t need to agree with me about issues like Intellectual Property law (or anything else, really) to get involved with any of this. The tools of Open Source are just that- tools. Good ones, in my opinion.
EDIT (5/16/2013)
https://github.com/igneus/Editio-Sti-Wolfgangi
by Jakub Pavlík
https://github.com/dgj1983/Gregorianisches-Brevier/
by David Gippner
or other version control systems:
https://code.google.com/p/gabc-chants/
by Albert Bloomfield
http://code.google.com/p/gregorio-books/
http://code.google.com/p/hildegard-symphonia/
http://code.google.com/p/lypsautierant/
by Br. Francis Therese Krautter
http://sourceforge.net/projects/dthymnbook/
by Veronica Brandt
Is chant like folk music?
Somehow we have this impression that Gregorian chant is part of a high Church ethos. It’s for conservatives and traditionalists who favor their liturgy buttoned up, obedient, and strict. On the other hand, this line of thinking goes, people who want authentic human expression of spontaneous religious experience should embrace popular music and a looser liturgical ethos.
I’ve always been puzzled by this caricature. And it is more than puzzling. It is poisonous to the liturgical debate because it reduces the whole issue to questions of taste, style, and education. It results in a strange class war that has nothing to do with what the liturgy is in its essentials and is asking from us.
If you look back at the roots of chant, and even just take time to understand what it means from a musical and historical point of view, you quickly find that it has nothing to do with music conservatories, stuffy performance venues, and rule-bound authoritarians. And, moreover, it has nothing to do with social class, taste, and educational level. The issue of the chanted Mass is really about whether the liturgy is going to be permitted to be what it is or whether we are going to replace its authentic voice with something else.
Maybe people forget that Gregorian chant is premodern in its origin. It was not somehow invented in the age of winged collars, top hats, and mutton chops. It arose from the world of the first millennium—before there were universities, conservatories, cathedrals, or individually owned books. Chant arose among people poorer than is even imaginable to us today. The singers were from the lowest class. The composers too were monks drawn from every strata of society. They did not write their music down because no one had figured out how to write music. That only began to happen in a coherent way about the 11th century. The work of the chant composers continued for many centuries and the results have been handed on to us today.
This is why chant is what it is today. And if you look closely, you can discover that first-millennium sense about it. The more you sing it, the more you discover its humane qualities—written and sung by people just like us.
The Soundtrack of Nothing in Particular
One of the occupational sacrifices of being a parish music director is you rarely get to hear other parish’s music. These last few weeks, now that my weekends are free, I’ve spent my Sundays at different parishes around town. I’ve attended Mass at two different parishes that made me feel quite old. At both Masses I was one of the oldest people in the church at the time, because the whole place was filled, and nearly wall-to-wall with young families. The median age was probably less than 10 years old. One Mass was in the Extraordinary Form, and the other in the Ordinary Form.
At both Masses, the music was sacred.
There were none of those nondescript, musically uncategorizable songs driven by mellow chord progressions and contrived cadences, and meaning absolutely nothing. No cantors raised their arms. The musicians sang from the loft, without drama or show, and with liturgical sensitivity. Propers were sung.
Unfortunately, this was not entirely the case yesterday in St. Peter’s Square. Although most of the music at the Mass was sacred, there was an element of the familiarly inadequate music that has come to characterize Catholic liturgies for the last few decades, the official Hymn of the Year of Faith. (Source: Year of Faith official website.)
It is not surprising that this kind of music affects the Church even in its otherwise most exemplary liturgical expressions. It is pervasive. No longer are we in the phase of liturgical shock treatment of the 70’s and early 80’s. We’re not experimenting with styles anymore. There is no more bluegrass or pseudo-Gospel or Broadway. Instead there is this one bland sound that seems almost consciously designed to avoid meaning anything whatsoever.
Contrast the innocuous, vague mellowness of this music with the vigor and courage that the Christian life demands, and you will realize why parents take their children to Masses with truly sacred music. Music is formative; art is formative–and the Christian life is difficult. What are the melodic arches and rich harmonies of a saintly life? What are the subtleties of its cadences? These must be reflected in our liturgical music.
At the Mass in St. Peter’s Square yesterday, the Holy Father exhorted the young people being confirmed during the Mass to Christian heroism, certainly in strong contrast to the noncommittal mediocrity of the hymn.
Commit yourselves to great ideals, to the most important things. We Christians were not chosen by the Lord for little things; push onwards toward the highest principles. Stake your lives on noble ideals, my dear young people!