Pop quiz, hotshot! What will you do?

RIP Dennis Hopper!

As my Brit bud IanW called me out last week, I’m in a red phone box with only a few quid and JT needs my post last week… I have only four lines of copy that I can shout to Tucker before the phone goes beep-beep-beep. Here goes:

1. Your pastor wants you to immediately engage the congregation in singing the propers, he insists upon their FCAP access. But he won’t switch from using a pulp subscription missal, so you only have the Entrance and Communion antiphon texts.
2. You also cannot publish any musical settings of any propers in either a weekly ordo or the parish bulletin; no $ for ordo, no space in bulletin. (Also, no audio/visual available.)
3. You have the SEP, the Vatican II Hymnal, every Rice choral and chant and short “chant-based” monophy collections, the entire CCW catalogue, BFW, B.Ford’s Amer. Gradual, Psallite, Ken Macek’s Psallite propers, C.Tietze’s strophic settings, and all the rest found at Musica Sacra, and you’ve composed some propers yourself. And NO PSALM TONES or the Wildcat gets blown up!*
4. How do you fulfill the pastor’s demand to get the congregation singing the propers under these strict conditions? (You cannot quote Mahrt!)

“What will you do, hotshot? WHAT WILL YOU DO?”
*Obscure reference from the film whose title remains unmentioned.
And a little personal PS for dance fans- if our scholas, choirs and cantors would take their regimens as seriously as the contestants on the Fox Reality “SO YOU THINK YOU CAN DANCE,” there wouldn’t be any musical problems in the American Roman Catholic Music scene, at ‘tall! These kids are artists!

16th Sunday in Ordinary Time, SEP Practice Videos

These chants from the Simple English Propers are now available for this Sunday. I’m enraptured by their structural similarity to the same propers in the Gregorian. The introit is exuberant, the offertory is contemplative, and the communion is…so Mode IV, which always suggests to my ear deep mystery (are all chants about burning things set in Mode IV?).


INTROIT • 16th Sunday in Ordinary Time from Church Music Association of Amer on Vimeo.


OFFERTORY • 16th Sunday in Ordinary Time from Church Music Association of Amer on Vimeo.

COMMUNION A & B • 16th Sunday in Ordinary Time from Church Music Association of Amer on Vimeo.

The New Translation a Flop?

Jerry Galipeau of Gotta Sing offers these words of wisdom to his friends who can’t stop attacking the new translation of the Missal:

I want to share something that has been eating away at me for quite some time. Most of those who have been offering scathing critiques of the new translation are counted among my friends. One critique recently went so far as to urge that we should refuse to use the new texts and stay with the current Sacramentary texts. I guess I find myself confused about these critiques. I, too, have spent lots of time with these texts and have discovered some real problems with some of the translations. But I wonder about passing a judgment of condemnation upon them, as some of the critics have done. It’s like a theater critic reading a script six weeks before opening night and declaring the play a flop.

When I was working with priests in Davenport, I chose some of the more problematic texts for them to work with. They divided up into small groups and I asked them to share their thoughts about the particular text assigned to the group. The complaints abounded. “This is all one long sentence.” “I can’t find the antecedent.” “The grammar just doesn’t look right to me.” “What kind of English is this anyway?” “I don’t think anyone will understand this prayer.”

Then I asked a member of the small group, “Father, would you pray that text for us?” After these priests had spent time visually analyzing the texts and expressings their thoughts about the texts, the actual praying of the texts surprised everyone in attendance. We heard things like, “Wow, despite the fact that it appeared stilted on the page, I think you did a beautiful job praying that prayer.” “Good job, Harry, that’s a tough text but you conveyed it beautifully.”

I was suprised by what occurred, which is why I think we really need to resist the temptation to condemn the text before “the curtain” actually rises.

Amen to that, as they say in some Southern houses of worship. You know, his comments could also apply to those who are panning Mass propers even before they have been tried, among whom…Jerry Galipeau in the post previous to this one! He says in his his post Let’s Get Real:

But, to be honest, I just don’t think this whole argument about the singing of the propers will ever amount to a hill of beans to these parish people. The people have grown accustomed to singing hymns and songs at the entrance and at communion from a wide variety of traditions at Saint James. When we sing Soon and Very Soon as the opening song in Advent, you would swear that we were “goin’ to see the king” right then and there. When we sing “Sweet, Sweet Spirit,” you take the deepest breaths you have ever taken, ’cause without a doubt you know that you are being revived. Whether we like it or not, these hymns and songs have become a living part of the Mass for the majority of Catholics. To suggest that these be phased out over the next few years, to be replaced by the chanted propers (or even the propers set to other musical styles) is just not realistic.

I must say that my experiences have been completely opposite. No, the people in the pews don’t rush up after Mass and say: what a fantastic performance today; that was just what I needed! Instead, they find themselves thinking and praying through the performers and through the music toward eternity. In fact, if people can’t wait to tell you how great your rendition of “Soon and Very Soon” was, there is a good reason to suspect a problem. Musicians should not seek that, should not want that. If we succeed in giving a lift to the prayers of the prayers, we have done what we are supposed to do.

(By the way, does it matter that “Soon…” refers not to Advent but to the Second Coming as understood in the premillennial Scofieldite tradition of 19th-century evangelicalism and that this view is rejected by the Catechism of the Catholic Church?)

This does not mean banning “Sweet, Sweet Spirit,” even though that song is not my favorite. Even if it were my favorite, I hope I would have the wisdom to see that this is not the right replacement for the propers of the Mass. Whether it can be sung as an additional song after the propers is a matter for discussion. There is a time and a place for everything, and we can argue forever about the kind of music we should schedule at youth retreats, prayer sessions, Church socials, or whatever. About the primary text and music of the Mass there really should be no argument: it should be the music or at least the texts of the Mass!

In any case, as with all these issues, the proof comes in the doing, as Jerry would say. All we are saying is give propers a chance.

By the way, I purchased the WLP Missal for home use and I can’t wait for it to arrive! Jerry tells me that they completely reset the music for the Missal chants to make them more beautiful (but without changing any of the structure of course).

The Catholic Youth Catastrophe

Catholic parishes that have a sense that they are losing the young are probably correct. Not knowing what else to do, they are still instituting “LifeTeen” programs that provide an opportunity for young bands to play popular music at Mass, some of it easily mistaken for a teenage jam session. They are also working to further make their educational programs more “relevant” to the lives of teens. ‘

What they do not realize is that it is precisely this sort of pandering that could be the source of the problem. In any case, it is obvious enough that this is not working.

Cause and effect is impossible to prove in social science, but it just can’t be purely coincidental that the meltdown of Catholic youth participation began its total meltdown around the same time that parishes started this trend toward treating them as a special segment within the Church that needed anything but clear teaching, solid doctrinal instruction, and solemn liturgy.

Consider the most detailed survey to date on youth attitudes toward religion. Conducted by Christian Smith of Notre Dame and the National Study of Youth and Religion, and reported in a book called Soul Searching, here is what he found.

He found a relatively lower level of religiosity and laxity of Catholic teenagers compared to teenagers in other U.S. Christian traditions. Among their findings are that when compared with Conservative Protestants, Black Protestants and Mormons, Catholic teens:

  • Have lower levels of attendance at religious services;
  • Would not attend religious services less if totally up to themselves;
  • Report that their religion is less important in shaping their daily lives and life decisions;
  • Substantially feel themselves less close to God;
  • Have somewhat more doubts about their religious beliefs;
  • Believe less that God is a personal being involved in the lives of people today;
  • Believe substantially less in a judgment day when God will reward some and punish others;
  • Believe less in miracles, the existence of angels, and life after death;
  • Believe more in reincarnation, astrology and in psychics and fortune-tellers;
  • Less have made a personal commitment to live life for God;
  • By a substantial margin fewer ever had an experience of spiritual worship that was very moving and powerful;
  • Fewer have shared their religious faith with someone not of their faith;
  • Pray less frequently;
  • Fewer are involved in a religious youth group;
  • Fewer are in congregation that have a designated youth minister;
  • Have less frequently attended Sunday School/CCD, been on a religious retreat, attended a religious conference or rally or camp, or been on a religious mission or service project;
  • Less frequently openly express their faith at school;
  • Less likely to have adults in their church, other than family members, whom they enjoy talking with and who give lots of encouragement;
  • More frequently report that they are bored in church;
  • Less frequently report that they find church a place that helps them think about important things;
  • Less frequently report that their congregation has helped them understand their own sexuality and sexual morality;
  • Less frequently report that their congregation has done a good job teaching them about their own religion.

The survey also reports that only 19 % of U.S. Catholic teenagers attend mass on a weekly basis and that 40% never attend. Truly, these are catastrophic findings. It means the loss of an entire generation, all accomplished in the name of winning them back. Those in charge don’t often see the connection because those who leave are gone and they go without explanation. Those who stay are the ones who don’t mind the pandering, the cheesy music, the fluffy teaching. Intelligent kids who can recognize that they aren’t be treated as emerging adults take off never return.

The researchers summarize: “It appears…that too many U.S. Catholics have through inertia continued to rest assured that old organizational structures were taking care of their children when in fact they increasingly have not been. And so many or most Catholics teenagers now pass through a Church system that has not fully come to terms with its own institutional deficit and structural vacuum with regard to providing substantial and distinctive Catholic socialization, education, and pastoral ministry for its teenagers.”

Of course most of the policies that are driving kids away are being put in place by people in the 40s, 50s, and 60s who can’t remember what it was like to be young and have older people attempt to spoon feed you and attempt to re-create a shoddy version of the secular culture that already envelopes the young. If the Church has nothing different, nothing challenging, nothing intelligent, and nothing fundamentally radical to offer, why bother? The youth see this even if their parents do not.

This confusion is not somehow limited to “progressives” in the Church. Generally conservative groups that place a strong emphasis on Catholic teaching also exhibit fundamental confusion, particularly as regards music in the liturgy. Unless something changed since the last time I checked (a year ago), at any camp sponsored by the group FOCUS, you are more likely to hear trap sets and loud guitars at Mass than Gregorian chant. Further, FOCUS seems to be sending its college missionaries out into the field armed with a vast repertoire of sacro-pop music but virtually no knowledge or experience in true liturgical music.

By the age of 18, kids can understand the difference between real Church music and pop tunes designed to manipulate them. What this approach ends up doing is driving away serious people, leaving only those who participate in the programs because they otherwise lack a social circle. In any case, this music is not accomplishing its goal; quite the reverse. If anyone can get through to the FOCUS leadership about this issue, be my guest. I’ve had no luck.

Is there hope? Absolutely. No group is so hungry for good liturgy as that which has been utterly starved for access to solemnity. Many people who have looked at the Simple English Propers carefully have concluded that the group most likely to feel drawn toward its solemnity and sacredness are the emerging adults. The Lifeteen groups are precisely the ones that will be drawn to the sense of liturgical accomplishment that singing these chants will elicit in their hearts and minds.

We can get the youth back. But it will take a dramatic turnaround in the strategies used over the last decade or so.

Here’s a Deal on the Parish Book of Chant

I was thinking about the Parish Book of Chant yesterday, realizing with some alarm that it was published just in time for the revival, and without it, we would be in real trouble.

It contains all the chant hymns that Catholics must know and that gets scholas and congregations going with singing chant. Richard Rice did the design and typesetting. Arlene Oost-Zinner had suggested the inclusion of the complete ordo for the ordinary and extraordinary forms. This turned out to be a brilliant addition because it demonstrates the parallels in a manner consistent with the current emphasis.

Nearly 12,000 copies have been distribution since its publication in 2008. That’s really an incredible number in this world. Again, this book was published just in time.

This is a 193-page hardback book. The CMAA has agreed to make it available for $7 each for a box of 40. This is a great book to have for the schola or congregation or just to have for your private evangelistic efforts. If you are interested in this large-quantity deal, write Janet Gorbitz and she can make the arrangements for you.

A Cistercian Twist on the Old Salve Regina

This is such an exciting and thrilling performance! The small changes from the Roman version are intriguing. Listening to this really makes me wonder if there are differences in conventions between parish and monastic practice. There is something about the pacing here that suggests a certain timelessness.

Take note of the sheer variety here, the differences in the way each chant is rendered. This is just so masterful. The structure is super tight, highly ordered, very practiced, and yet…the singing has a wild spontaneity to it that sometimes suggests total elation.