USCCB Endorses Gregorian Chant

This shouldn’t be news but we all know the politics behind all these debates. This is why I’m nearly dumbfounded (again I shouldn’t be) by this news from Fr. Z. It is a quotation from the latest CDW letter from the USCCB

In the selection of songs for the liturgy, “[p]reference should be given to songs which are of clear biblical inspiration and which express, through the harmony of music and words, the beauty of God’s word” (no. 70). These words should give new impetus to composers, and also inspire all to make greater use of Gregorian chant.

The AUG, the SEP, and What to Sing in a Pinch

My new copy of the Anglican Use Gradual came yesterday. I find this book completely indispensable. It is the Catholic musician’s best friend.

It has all the schola propers of the Roman Rite arranged according to the current calendar and beautiful set to Gregorian tones. If you can’t sing the Roman Gradual, this is a great way to have the propers happen and they sound very beautiful. One fan calls it “instant class” – a funny remark that you would understand if you know the way the music and words work in this book.

In so many ways, this book is the direct influence on the Simple English Propers currently in preparation: its ease of use, its practicality, its connection to history, its dignity, its accessibility.

Hard copy is essential (though you can download it too). He is where you can buy it.

The Secular and the Sacred in Alabama…

And for once an appropriate time for marching tunes and party music! Auburn University in Auburn, Alabama, won the national college football championship this evening.

It doesn’t usually snow in Auburn, but it did this past weekend. Most of the town didn’t mind having to take a snow day, as everyone was preparing for the tonight’s game against the University of Oregon.

Auburn, for those of you who wonder what the connection is with the CMAA, lies smack-dab in the middle of the Bible Belt. It is just a charming town to live and work in: forward-looking, yet always grounded in gentility. A college town that loves its football team. The best of the old South thrives in Auburn, the city that hosts the CMAA programs office, and has one Catholic church – where the St. Cecilia Schola sings Gregorian and English propers weekly at the 7:45am Mass. If it can happen here, it can happen anywhere.

More from the City of Auburn website:

One of the City of Auburn’s most recognizable landmarks, Toomer’s Corner is at the intersection of College Street and Magnolia Avenue in the heart of the City of Auburn. With Toomer’s Drugs, an Auburn landmark since 1896, facing what has since 1856 been the anchoring corner of Auburn’s campus, Toomer’s Corner is the nexus of campus and city life. [Toomer’s Corner is about a block away from the CMAA office.]

The Toomer’s Corner webcam affords a view of the twin, century-old oak trees which have celebrated Auburn’s spirit with countless thousands of revelers who have engaged in the long-standing tradition of “rolling Toomer’s Corner”, a celebration occurring after every significant Auburn sports victory.

Here’s a link to the webcam. Take a look at our fair city this evening and enjoy – revelry is expected until the wee hours.

And here is what things usually look like at Toomer’s Corner:

War Eagle! Now back to Psalm setting, program planning, and the rest of real life.

Simple Propers for the Second Sunday in Ordinary Time

Download Simple Propers for the Second Sunday in Ordinary Time

It has been my goal to be far ahead of the week-to-week by this point in the Simple Propers Project. There have been a few complications in the collaborative effort that is taking place which continues to hold back the progress, and for this I apologize. Over the next two weeks though you can expect to have the next stretch of Ordinary Time completed and posted, and we will begin working into Lent and Easter.

Bear in mind, though, that these still are considered rough drafts. I have made the decision now to proceed firmly producing these drafts which will be thoroughly reviewed after the entire year is complete. So you may sing a somewhat different version next year, when you will undoubtedly have the finished book in your hands. But in the mean time you can be assured that you can adequately prepare with the resources you need in the real-time situation that we’re battling against.

Please keep the project in your prayers. It really is a massive undertaking and all who are involved are learning a great deal in the process.

Winter Chant Intensive 2011: Wrap-Up

As promised, I now offer my concluding thoughts on the CMAA 2011 Winter Chant Intensive.

As I mentioned in my first post last week, I had a few particular objectives in attending my first CMAA training event. My objectives surely are unique to me, and I am not speaking for the entire group that attended. Every participant comes from a different situation, a different location, a different background, and surely everyone walked away from the Intensive with something different. This is surely one of the most beautiful things about such an event, and the results were truly wonderful.

My first objective was to grow intellectually in the art and science of singing and directing Gregorian chant. Toward this aim the advanced group sat at the feet of Dr. William Mahrt, venerable musicologist and Stanford professor, for up to 7 hours each day. Anyone who has had the opportunity to simply sit and listen to a scholar in old age who has spent his entire life delving the depths of the topics that he is discussing knows what a sublime experience this is. Better still is the opportunity to discuss topics and ask questions in a seminar setting. What might take a person many years to understand on their own can suddenly be presented to them in thorough and breathtaking clarity. Such was the case in Dr. Mahrt’s sessions. Even if he spent a half-hour or more arriving at a single point, following the journey to arrive at that point is almost as valuable than the point itself for aspiring scholars, musicians and artists. These sorts of opportunities cannot be passed up, and I am so very grateful for the opportunity to soak in all that Dr. Mahrt had to offer this past week.

My second objective was to consider methods of chant interpretation other than the one that I have been primarily trained in. My training in chant has primarily been in what is called the “New Solesmes” school, or the “Cardine” or “Semiological” school. I knew previously that Dr. Mahrt does not adhere strictly to a single school of thought, but that he uses elements of both schools of thought, including others such as Domincan chant, and his own insights from studying the writings of Medieval theorists. I also knew that in practice much of what is taught at CMAA events relies very heavily on the methodology of what is often called the “Old Solesmes” method, or the “Ward Method”. These systematic methodologies were advanced by Doms Mocquereau and Gajard in the first part of the 20th c. and also by Justine Ward in her practical instructions on the singing of chant.

I found it very interesting, then, that one of Dr. Mahrt’s first topics was a discussion of the different schools of thought in the practice of singing Gregorian chant. I was personally very excited to see him hand out photocopies of the Mass Propers for the Feast of the Epiphany from the Graduale Triplex, which contains 10th c. manuscripts which are the subject of Gregorian Semiology, and asked everyone to sing from this edition. I could see on the faces of many seasoned chanters in the room a sort of wide-eyed or mildly bewildered look as they looked at these pages, some for the first time. Many of the singers present had the “Old Solesmes” system down so cold that I can imagine that they saw very little value in the early manuscripts. In fact, as we sight-read through some of these pieces for the first time a perfectly nice result was achieved. All of the pitches were correct, the text was sung with correct pronunciation, the lengthenings were conventional and unified, surely for some this was a perfectly acceptable performance for any Sunday parish liturgy. But Dr. Mahrt insisted that there was so much more to be found in the chants in regard to their rhythm, to their expression, and that the early manuscripts found in the Graduale Triplex contained so much of this information which simply could not be found in the modern square note editions.

Dr. Mahrt worked very hard throughout our singing of these proper chants over the course of the week to get us away from a tendency to slightly stress every successive note in a chant melody. He described how Medieval theorists described a neume as a single movement, a single stroke of the breath, and that many of the ancient neumes similarly contained in one stroke of the pen 5 or often more notes. Our goal was to sing these neumes in a legato and flowing manner as such. He also tried relentlessly to get us singers to away from “doubling” notes with horizontal episema, and the first note of the quilisma. Many of the singers had great struggles with this, and seemed to continue to fall back into patterns of even accentuation, and of strictly doubling notes since they laid so nicely in a pattern of equal pulses. I also found it very interesting that both conductors verbally reprimanded the doubling of these two notes, yet I observed that in their conducting they very often conducted these notes in a manner that was perfectly doubled according to the established more or less equal “pulse”! I say this in good fun, and with the greatest respect for both Mahrt and Turkington, and only mention it as an observation that I have made in the practice of a school of interpretation that I have little experience with.

There came early in the course of our singing of the Epiphany propers a sudden command from Dr. Mahrt: “Okay, why don’t just ‘count out’ this phrase”. And what followed was a perfectly unified singing of “1-2, 1-2-3, 1-2, 1-2…” on the pitches of the chant in question by the majority of the singers in the room–all except for three. I personally have NEVER counted a chant in 2’s and 3’s. I don’t even know how, actually! And another singer who had sung chant as a child in London sat still with a look of bewilderment. After this was concluded she softly raised her hand and politely asked “might I kindly ask what is this counting that we’re doing?” We all had a good laugh and Dr. Mahrt gave a brief description of the “Old Solesmes” method to those who weren’t familiar with it. I find it very interesting, though, that the entire group proceeded to sing the same music together without a strict reliance on a single mode of thought. I do think, though, that the Old Solesmes method was not able to be overcome by the end of the session. This was the predominant influence on the group of singers, and many of the nuanced elements of rhythm and expression proposed by Dr. Mahrt seemed not to stick. It is not that the end result was not beautiful–it was in its own way. But I found this very interesting to observe, and I wonder if an approach that begins with a rhythm that is found first in the text, and in the ancient neumes might produce different results.

So overall I found the advanced session to be very enriching in a multitude of ways. My only disappointment is that we seemed only to begin to scratch the surface in exploring a more nuanced singing of the chant, especially by means of analyzing the information that is found in the early manuscripts. The singing itself, in the end, did not seem to go too far beyond the rudiments of the Old Solesmes method, and I suspect that many of the singers and directors in the session were prepared for a more in depth exploration of the elements of chant interpretation. I personally would love to see in future “advanced” sessions a more thorough or even systematic consideration of the elements of Gregorian Semiology, which, after my experience of the Chant Intensive, I see not so much as conflicting with Old Solesmes, so much as I see it as a continuation of what began in the Old Solesmes Method.

My third objective in attending the Chant Intensive was to consider, on the part of my diocesan Office of Worship, how training seminars like those put on by the CMAA could supplement the training and catechesis that will be taking place in the coming year as we prepare for the implementation of the new translation of the Roman Missal in Advent of 2011. The events put on by the CMAA have been in the forefront of the chant training efforts in the United States for the past several years, and I was very happy to observe how the task was handled. I must say that the entire week was orchestrated in a very balanced way and I think that similar scaled-down versions could be offered on the diocesan level with the intention of embracing the implementation of the new translation as an opportunity grow in our ability to sing the Mass. This means that priests and deacons need to be trained to sing their part, and that musicians also can understand the role that they play in the liturgy which involves singing the proper of the Mass, and leading the congregation in the singing of their parts which primarily include the Order of Mass and the Ordinary of the Mass. I can’t wait to implement these sorts of training programs in my own diocese as we prepare for the new translation of the Roman Missal.

And finally, my fourth objective was to take a week of spiritual retreat. One of the most beautiful things about the Chant Intensive was connection to the sacraments. Every day participants were given the opportunity to attend daily Mass, in either the Ordinary or Extraordinary Form, and to avail themselves to a sacramental confession if it was desired. This is the fundamental difference between studying Gregorian chant in a sterile classroom environment, and studying it within the framework of the liturgical life of the Church. The highlight of the week, without a doubt, was the solemn Mass in the Extraordinary Form that concluded the week of study. Both choirs prepared portions of the sung liturgy, dividing up propers, in singing together Kyriale Mass IX. The ceremonial was complete and the ministers executed the rites with solemn dignity and beauty. There were many parishioners of St. Patrick’s Parish who also attended the liturgy and vocally participated in the Order of Mass and much of the Ordinary as well.

What I found particularly striking in this liturgy was that the main celebrant, Fr. Klores, pastor of St. Patrick’s in New Orleans, took up the desire of Pope Benedict XVI that both the EF and OF should mutually enrich each other. Many traditionalists perhaps see this as an opportunity for the OF to conform to the EF, but I was very edified by the Epistle and Gospel which were both sung prominently and solemnly in the vernacular, and by the Pater Noster which was sung not just by the priest, but in full by the congregation. My experience of liturgy has primarily been and remains in the OF, and I was so inspired by the pastoral decision to implement these two developments which find their origin in the liturgical reforms of Sacrosanctum Concilium. It is this sort of enrichment of the Roman Rite that is the future of the liturgy, I think. Needless to say this liturgical celebration was among the most beautiful and prayerful acts of worship that I have ever participated in. God was given worship befitting a King, and the souls present, including my own, were edified and sanctified.

All in all, the 2011 Winter Chant Intensive was a wonderful success and a very welcomed time of retreat and study. I am thankful to God for the work that the CMAA is doing in encouraging and training musicians in the music of the Roman Rite, and for doing so with a vital connection to the font of grace that is the Eucharistic liturgy and the sacraments.

Mutual Enrichment and the Reform of the Reform: A Game Plan?

Not that anyone asks my opinion, but one of the things I think is wrong with the Liturgy Wars is that most people seem to start the discussion from their answer to the question: What do I think the liturgy should look like? Yet, the liturgy is not about us, it’s about God. And the Popular Mechanics approach to liturgy which has made everyone an expert in DIY Rites means that anyone who has ever come into contact with the Mass has an opinion. So generally I avoid like the plague pontificating on how I think the liturgy should be celebrated and try to actually live the liturgy instead.

Yet the Vicar of Christ, Pope Benedict XVI, has called for the mutual enrichment of the Ordinary and Extraordinary Forms of the Roman Rite and has also suggested that the time has come for a Reform of the Reform of the rites after the Second Vatican Council. He has also reiterated that there should be mutual respect of both forms and no “ritual mixing.” And so many voices are out there calling for a reform of the modern Roman Rite, it’s hard to know what such a reform should look like. There are some who are determined to make sure that the Extraordinary Form never has any influence on the Ordinary Form, and, if they had their way, they would obliterate its memory from the face of the earth in the most radical damnatio memoriae known to human history. For them there is no question of mutual enrichment; rather, they advance a platform of constant liturgical anarchy. Then there are those for whom mutual enrichment sounds like a plot to infect the venerable classical worship of the Church with the theological and spiritual rot that has affected the ephemeral postmodern worship (?) of the new community sung into being.

As a parish priest who habitually celebrates both forms, I am left scratching my head how the two forms are supposed to enrich each other organically if I can’t mix the rites. Pope Benedict XVI has given us a rich teaching on the liturgy as Cardinal Ratzinger, and he has also given the Church quite an example of how to celebrate the liturgy. But I am sure I am not alone in desperately wishing for some more practical guidance as to how exactly this is supposed to done and what I can and cannot do to help bring about the organic restoration of the sacred.

And so I think out loud in this essay and ask for comments. In the final analysis, I wait for the Church’s instructions on how to go about this. But I do wonder if there could not be three possible stages to the Mutual Enrichment and Reform of the Reform, and so I outline what that might look like here. I offer no timeline to this little fantasy, and I have no illusions that this discussion will go beyond the loyal readers of this blog. But here it is. Discuss.

First Stage of Mutual Enrichment

In this first stage, I see that there are many things that can be done now with no mixing of or change to the Ordinary and Extraordinary Forms of the Roman Rite as currently found in the liturgical books. I also envision some guidance from the Magisterium to point this mutual enrichment in the right direction so as to avoid arbitrariness and to give those priests who respond to the call to mutual enrichment support.

Enrichment of the Ordinary Form by the Extraordinary Form
– Bishops in Cathedrals and Pastors in their churches spontaneously adopting the ad orientem position at Mass as implicit in the OF after sustained catechesis of the faithful
– Reconstruction of altar rails in churches and the spontaneous use of the communion rail as a place from which to distribute Holy Communion
– Catechesis from the pulpit about the Church’s preference for Holy Communion on the tongue and under one species
– Move towards singing the Ordinary of the Mass in Latin at OF Masses
– Priests, on their own, choosing the options of the OF which are analogous to the EF, and leaving aside those which are not
– The spontaneous and consistent use by the clergy of the maniple, biretta, amice
– Singing of the Propers according to the Graduale Romanum at Sung Masses
– Enforcement of the ecclesiastical discipline on extraordinary ministers of Holy Communion

Enrichment of the Extraordinary Form by the Ordinary Form
– Celebration of at least one EF Mass as part of the ordinary Sunday Mass schedule by clergy trained to do it in their parishes.
– Use of the readings in the vernacular at Low Masses
– Recitation of the parts pertinent to the faithful
– Use of new prefaces and new saints’ Masses in the EF.

Magisterial Involvement
– document by the Congregations for Divine Worship and Doctrine of the Faith clarifying the Church’s teaching and discipline on the reception of Holy Communion, indicating the preference for the Church’s traditional mode of reception. In the same document, a clarification of the right of the priest to celebrate Mass ad orientem.

Second Stage of Reform of the Reform

In this second stage, the Magisterium would change the existing relevant liturgical and canonical legislation as well as provide new editions of the OF and EF Missals.

Papal Encyclical and Disciplinary Norms
The Reform of the Reform would be ushered into being by a papal encyclical, the Mediator Dei of our time. This encyclical would present a rich theology of the liturgy, a frank and honest reappraisal of post-Vatican II liturgical praxis, and a liturgical, historical, theological and canonical explanation of the following: the two forms of the Roman Rite and their mutual enrichment, the ad orientem position of celebration at the altar, the traditional mode for the reception of Holy Communion, Latin and sacred music. This encyclical would strongly encourage in an optional but clear way all of the points of the Reform of the Reform. This would be followed, after consultation with the entire hierarchy in a special synod on the Reform of the Reform, disciplinary norms which would indicate the normative status of each of the points of the Reform of the Reform.

Restoration of the Subdiaconate and the Revisiting of Pontificalis Domus
The disciplinary norms would include the restoration of the ancient subdiaconate to the life of the Church put in abeyance by Paul VI’s Ministeria Quaedam. It would also revisit the simplifications in Paul VI’s Pontificalis Domus concerning the costume of prelates to allow greater freedom for hierarchical dress.

Norms on Church Construction
Issuance by the Congregation for Divine Worship of practical guidelines for the building of new churches and the fabrication of new linens, vestments and vessels with accompanying theological and spiritual commentary (d’apres St Robert Bellarmine’s works on church construction).

The Reform of the Reform Edition of the OF Missal after the Encyclical
– dropping the options which are rarely used, streamlining of remaining options
– all editions of the Missal would be bilingual
– all editions of the Lectionary would be bilingual
– addition of a new Ritus Servandus with more detailed rubrics for the ceremonies
– the addition of the EF Prayers at the Foot of the Altar, Offertory Prayers and Last Gospel as an option in the OF
– restoration of the genuflection at the Creed and before the elevations in the OF
– restoration of some feasts from EF
– integration of Orations from the EF as options
– issuance of a Caeremoniale Presbyterorum from the Papal Household in a companion volume to the Missal
– integration of the Offertory Antiphons from the EF
– making the Prayer of the Faithful optional
– substantial restoration of the EF Kalendar to the OF
– integration of the EF Lectionary as an optional cycle of the OF

The Reform of the Reform Edition of the EF Missal after the Enyclical
– all editions would include the Readings, Antiphons and Orations in the vernacular as an option.
– permission for Holy Communion by intinction
– option for the pre-1955 Holy Week Rites
– addition of OF saints’ feasts not present in EF Missal as optional
– addition of some OF Prefaces
– option to omit the Prayers at the Foot of the Altar and the Last Gospel
– composition of vernacular graduals for the antiphons for optional use
– option for the use of the OF Lectionary at Low Masses
– option for the distibution of Holy Communion by ordained subdeacons

Third Stage of the Missal of Benedict XVI, Pope of the Sacred Liturgy
This third stage would take place after the Reform of the Reform has been in place for some time and the Roman Curia, together with the world episcopate, can look into the feasibility of a once again united form of the Roman liturgy. With some distance from the post-Vatican II reforms and the lived experience of the Reform of the Reform, the Magisterium of the Church could ostensibly distill the organic development of the liturgy from its restoration and renewal into one Roman Rite again.

Is this a do-able Game Plan?
Let it be said from the beginning, that I am perfectly fine with celebrating the Missal of St Pius V in toto and the Missal of Paul VI as the occasion warrants. I do recognize, however, that flexibility in rubrics, calendars and rites, Communion under both species and the vernacular are among those things that Vatican II called for. Could they be allowed in the EF in an optional way so as to open the riches of the EF liturgy to more people? Also, the OF could easily be influenced by many of the prayers and ceremonies of the EF if that influence is tutelaged well by the Magisterium. But if priests attempt any of this on their own, they risk making the liturgy into an eccentric celebration of their opinion on how they think Mass should be celebrated. Because so much of the post-Vatican II Reform was imposed inorganically by arbitrary decisions of clergy and by officialdom, the Mutual Enrichment and Reform of the Reform also has to happen by the leadership of the clergy united with the Holy Father and the Roman Curia in collaboration with the world episcopate. Then, the organic process of liturgical development can begin again, and the future will be less charged with everyone making their own opinions into the standard of liturgical celebration.

I would love feedback on this scheme. I am not wedded to it. In fact, I am not totally sure that many of the ideas I propose here are prudent, workable or even desirable. But the discussion is beginning. This time, however, may we start, not with What do I think the liturgy should look like? but with How can I support the communion of the Church to restore the sacred and celebrate the Christian Mystery in spirit and in truth?